Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

tube-bridge vs BuildFeed

tube-bridge is an MCP server published by TheWhiteWater. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). BuildFeed is an MCP server published by buildfeed.tech. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacetube-bridgeBuildFeed
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.1.7
Downloads/month (PyPI): 192
Downloads/week (PyPI): 187
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

tube-bridge vs BuildFeed
Facttube-bridgeBuildFeed
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)1No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-11-04Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (tube-bridge)Remote server (buildfeed.tech/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)3, secrets among them: 2Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/thewhitewater/tube-bridgeNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)10
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-14
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkStatus out of date: last check 44 h ago returned HTTP 405

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

tube-bridge

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

YouTube MCP server for search, transcripts, frames, comments, channels, and local semantic corpora.

BuildFeed

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Startup, product, and design takes from curated tech YouTube, with timestamped transcript passages.

How to run each

tube-bridge As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "TUBE_BRIDGE_PROXY=<YOUR_TUBE_BRIDGE_PROXY>" --env "YOUTUBE_API_KEY=<YOUR_YOUTUBE_API_KEY>" --transport stdio tube-bridge -- uvx tube-bridge

Requires: TUBE_BRIDGE_PROXY (secret), YOUTUBE_API_KEY (secret)

BuildFeed As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http buildfeed https://buildfeed.tech/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only BuildFeed has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of BuildFeed publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: tube-bridge · What it can do: BuildFeed · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built