Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Audio vs AudioKit

Audio is an MCP server published by audiojs. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). AudioKit is an MCP server published by epsilon-records. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceAudioAudioKit
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 2.10.0
Downloads/month (npm): 1 539
Downloads/week (npm): 685
Forks (GitHub): 11
Stars (GitHub): 336
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Audio vs AudioKit
FactAudioAudioKit
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)336No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)11No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (audio)Remote server (api.audiokit.ai/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/audiojs/audioNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-11-13
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 14 h ago, requires authentication

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Audio

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Edit, analyze and convert audio: loudness, spec checks, denoise, EQ, cuts, BPM, key. No ffmpeg.

AudioKit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Audio analysis and production jobs: BPM, key, fingerprint, tags, stems, cleanup, mastering.

How to run each

Audio As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio audio -- npx -y audio --mcp

AudioKit As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http audiokit https://api.audiokit.ai/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only AudioKit has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Audio · What it can do: AudioKit · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built