Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

6Frame Verify vs Latitude 10 Agent Readiness

6Frame Verify is an MCP server published by bret1976. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Latitude 10 Agent Readiness is an MCP server published by latitude10.tech. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-11. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplace6Frame VerifyLatitude 10 Agent Readiness
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.3.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.1
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

6Frame Verify vs Latitude 10 Agent Readiness
Fact6Frame VerifyLatitude 10 Agent Readiness
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-10-12Not published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (siteverify.dev/mcp)Remote server (latitude10.tech/mcp/readiness)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/bret1976/6frame-verifyNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Answered with HTTP 404 (12 h ago)Responded 11 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

6Frame Verify

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Pre-launch website QA in 60s via real Chromium. $3/check; agents can pay in USDC (x402).

Latitude 10 Agent Readiness

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Scores how well AI agents will use your API, 0-100, from its OpenAPI spec. Free and read-only.

How to run each

6Frame Verify As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http 6frame-verify https://siteverify.dev/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Latitude 10 Agent Readiness As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http agent-readiness https://latitude10.tech/mcp/readiness

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only the endpoint of Latitude 10 Agent Readiness responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: 6Frame Verify · What it can do: Latitude 10 Agent Readiness · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built