Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic vs FHIR MCP Server

io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic is an MCP server published by itsryanarmani. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). FHIR MCP Server is an MCP server published by wso2. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, PyPI (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinicFHIR MCP Server
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.11.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 456
Downloads/week (PyPI): 483
Forks (GitHub): 59
Stars (GitHub): 137
Not marked · First seen
PyPI (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 0.11.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 456
Downloads/week (PyPI): 483
Forks (GitHub): 59
Stars (GitHub): 137
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic vs FHIR MCP Server
Factio.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinicFHIR MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub137
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub59
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-29
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (peptideclinic.fyi/mcp)On your machine (fhir-mcp-server)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)Not statedApache-2.0
Repository (differs)github.com/itsryanarmani/directorygithub.com/wso2/fhir-mcp-server
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen (differs)2026-11-072026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 21 h agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Find a licensed peptide clinic, in person or by telehealth.

FHIR MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server providing seamless access to FHIR APIs for AI tools and healthcare applications

How to run each

io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http peptideclinic https://peptideclinic.fyi/mcp

FHIR MCP Server As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FHIR_SERVER_BASE_URL=<YOUR_FHIR_SERVER_BASE_URL>" --transport stdio fhir-mcp-server -- uvx fhir-mcp-server

Requires: FHIR_SERVER_BASE_URL

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: io.github.itsryanarmani/peptideclinic · What it can do: FHIR MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built