Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

health4ai vs HC Sync: Health Connect data

health4ai is an MCP server published by jefflitt1. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). HC Sync: Health Connect data is an MCP server published by shaharfrish6. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-09. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacehealth4aiHC Sync: Health Connect data
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 187
Downloads/week (PyPI): 19
Forks (GitHub): 5
Stars (GitHub): 7
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.3.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

health4ai vs HC Sync: Health Connect data
Facthealth4aiHC Sync: Health Connect data
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)7No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (health4ai)Remote server (hcsync.dev/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/jefflitt1/health4aiNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-11-08
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 2 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

health4ai

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Query your Apple Health data from your own Supabase/Postgres via local MCP.

HC Sync: Health Connect data

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read Android Health Connect users, daily summaries and records synced to your backend.

How to run each

health4ai As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "DATABASE_URL=<YOUR_DATABASE_URL>" --env "HEALTHKIT_USER_ID=<YOUR_HEALTHKIT_USER_ID>" --transport stdio health4ai -- uvx health4ai

Requires: DATABASE_URL (secret), HEALTHKIT_USER_ID

HC Sync: Health Connect data As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http hc-sync https://hcsync.dev/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only HC Sync: Health Connect data has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of HC Sync: Health Connect data publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: health4ai · What it can do: HC Sync: Health Connect data · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built