Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.linhnnmt/genai-capture vs Sight by Raku

io.github.linhnnmt/genai-capture is an MCP server published by linhnnmt. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Sight by Raku is an MCP server published by raku.so. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.linhnnmt/genai-captureSight by Raku
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Downloads/month (npm): 124
Downloads/week (npm): 47
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.linhnnmt/genai-capture vs Sight by Raku
Factio.github.linhnnmt/genai-captureSight by Raku
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (genai-capture-mcp)Remote server (sightapi.raku.so/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/projecthsf/genai-captureNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-13
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 17 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.linhnnmt/genai-capture

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Capture & annotate your screen from an AI agent: arrows, boxes, text, highlight, blur/redact.

Sight by Raku

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Check work from photos: read results, write checks in plain words, send photos for a verdict.

How to run each

io.github.linhnnmt/genai-capture As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio genai-capture -- npx -y genai-capture-mcp

Sight by Raku As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http sight https://sightapi.raku.so/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Sight by Raku has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: io.github.linhnnmt/genai-capture · What it can do: Sight by Raku · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built