Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Linkwarden vs Purl

Linkwarden is an MCP server published by ni-c. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Purl is an MCP server published by nublson. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceLinkwardenPurl
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.4.0
Downloads/month (npm): 249
Downloads/week (npm): 115
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.5.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 3
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Linkwarden vs Purl
FactLinkwardenPurl
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)3 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)Not published2026-11-07
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (linkwarden-mcp)Remote server (purl.live/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)6, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/ni-c/linkwarden-mcpgithub.com/nublson/purl
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 15 h ago, requires authentication

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Linkwarden

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server for Linkwarden, the self-hosted bookmark manager with page preservation

Purl

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Save, organize and share your Purl links from any MCP client.

How to run each

Linkwarden As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "LINKWARDEN_TOKEN=<YOUR_LINKWARDEN_TOKEN>" --env "LINKWARDEN_URL=<YOUR_LINKWARDEN_URL>" --transport stdio linkwarden-mcp -- npx -y linkwarden-mcp

Requires: LINKWARDEN_TOKEN (secret), LINKWARDEN_URL

Purl As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http purl https://purl.live/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Purl has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Purl publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Linkwarden · What it can do: Purl · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built