Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server vs Tfl

io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server is an MCP server published by oneill9. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Tfl is an MCP server published by pipeworx-io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-09. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-serverTfl
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.5.2
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.2.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server vs Tfl
Factio.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-serverTfl
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)1 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)Not published2026-11-05
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (ghcr.io/oneill9/tfl-mcp-server:1.5.2)Remote server (gateway.pipeworx.io/tfl/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for1, secrets among them: 11, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/oneill9/tfl-mcp-servergithub.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-tfl
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)01
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 21 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Community-built server providing real-time London transport data via the TfL Unified API

Tfl

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Transport for London (TfL) Unified API MCP — keyless.

How to run each

io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "TFL_APP_KEY=<YOUR_TFL_APP_KEY>" --transport stdio tfl-mcp-server -- docker run -i --rm -e TFL_APP_KEY ghcr.io/oneill9/tfl-mcp-server:1.5.2

Requires: TFL_APP_KEY (secret)

Tfl As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tfl https://gateway.pipeworx.io/tfl/mcp

Requires: PIPEWORX_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Tfl has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server asks for

  • TFL_APP_KEY (secret)

Only Tfl asks for

  • PIPEWORX_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: io.github.oneill9/tfl-mcp-server · What it can do: Tfl · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built