Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

AWS HealthOmics vs SanYu Research Engine

AWS HealthOmics is an MCP server published by awslabs. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). SanYu Research Engine is an MCP server published by kfx2026. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-09. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceAWS HealthOmicsSanYu Research Engine
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:ec0cd4776cbe
Forks (GitHub): 1 857
Pulls (Docker Hub): 13 148
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 9 892
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

AWS HealthOmics vs SanYu Research Engine
FactAWS HealthOmicsSanYu Research Engine
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)9 892 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)13 148No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 857 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-11-08
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/aws-healthomics-mcp-server)Remote server (sanyu.wentangkeji.com/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)73Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 0Not published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/awslabs/mcpgithub.com/kfx2026/sanyu-research-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)06
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-11-06
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkStatus out of date: last check 31 h ago returned HTTP 200

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

AWS HealthOmics

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Generate, run, debug lifescience workflows.

SanYu Research Engine

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

145 tools: 106 deterministic engines (stats, survival, bioinfo, primers) + 39 AI writers.

How to run each

AWS HealthOmics As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio aws-healthomics -- docker run -i --rm mcp/aws-healthomics-mcp-server

SanYu Research Engine As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http sanyu-research https://sanyu.wentangkeji.com/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only SanYu Research Engine has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of SanYu Research Engine publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of SanYu Research Engine publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: AWS HealthOmics · What it can do: SanYu Research Engine · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built