Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

zimi-mcp vs Keepfor.me

zimi-mcp is an MCP server published by epheterson. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). Keepfor.me is an MCP server published by melcutz. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacezimi-mcpKeepfor.me
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 1.15.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 0
Downloads/week (PyPI): 147
Forks (GitHub): 7
Stars (GitHub): 95
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

zimi-mcp vs Keepfor.me
Factzimi-mcpKeepfor.me
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)95 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)7 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)2026-11-07Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (zimi-mcp)Remote server (app.keepfor.me/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)GPL-3.0-or-laterNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/epheterson/zimigithub.com/melcutz/keepfor.me
Changes in the last 7 days22
First seen (differs)2026-10-132026-11-05
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkStatus out of date: last check 33 h ago returned HTTP 401

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

zimi-mcp

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

Zimi's MCP server and search alone: search and read Wikipedia, Stack Overflow and other ZIM files offline, for AI agents

Keepfor.me

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Your personal library, readable by AI agents: durable snapshots, hybrid search, 46 MCP tools.

How to run each

zimi-mcp

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Keepfor.me As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http keepfor-me https://app.keepfor.me/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Keepfor.me has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: zimi-mcp · What it can do: Keepfor.me · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built